Research portfolio

 

---

### 1. SRBMPR Research Foundation

SRBMPR (Container Transfer / Forward Trace) is a market-structure research framework, not a trading signal system.

Core principle (locked):
> “The container travels; raw data does not. Each target uses its OWN market data. MATCH is structural identity (container type + H/L connection architecture + completion), NEVER a similarity / DTW / correlation / accuracy score.”

Research is conducted fractal across timeframes (Monthly → Weekly → Daily → lower). Higher-timeframe container type is established first. Lower timeframes are used only to refine exact dates and boundary points; they are not permitted to redefine the macro container type.

---

### 2. Raw Data Protocol

All analysis begins from genuine source data only.

Locked rules:
- Raw OHLC + exact timestamps must come from a named source.
- No fabrication, interpolation, or estimation of missing Entry / SL / Target values.
- A logged decision is never retroactively altered after it is written.
- RR is calculated only when Entry, SL and Target are all present and deterministically derived. If any field is missing, RR remains empty.
- One SL hit triggers global STOP & CHECK. The engine does not continue past a single SL without explicit review.

Source → timestamp (UTC) → sequence → mechanism → result.
Any record missing required raw fields is rejected.

---

### 3. Cycle Construction

A container is defined by four structural points:

- **Origin / Zero** — A confirmed structural swing pivot (the anchor).
- **Apex** — The pivot farthest in price from the anchor (main extreme / connection point).
- **LEFT side** — Structural legs from Origin up to and including the Apex (build side).
- **RIGHT side** — Structural legs from Apex to Completion (unwind side).

Container identity is expressed as `(left_count, right_count)`:
Type 1 = (1,1) · Type 2 = (2,2) · Type 3 = (3,3).

These numbers are identity counts, not accuracy scores.

---

### 4. LEFT / RIGHT Architecture

- **LEFT** = path from Origin → Apex (build).
In polarity terms this corresponds to the High → Low or Low → High sequence that forms the stretch.
- **RIGHT** = path from Apex → Completion (unwind).
The return sequence that brings price back toward the Origin level.

LEFT count and RIGHT count must match for a valid container type.
H/L connection sequence may be direct or mirrored (polarity flip allowed) provided the count architecture remains identical.

---

### 5. Cycle Completion

Completion is binary and non-negotiable:

> Price returns to the anchor (Origin / Zero) level — an A → Z round-trip.

- If price returns to the Origin level → cycle is complete.
- If price does not return → cycle is incomplete / truncated.

No other condition substitutes for return to Origin.
Incomplete containers are not transferred forward.

---

### 6. Reverse Backtest Protocol

Reverse reconstruction is meaningful only after the cycle definition is locked.

Required sequence:
1. Locked cycle definition (Origin, Apex, LEFT count, RIGHT count, Completion rule)
2. Exact High / Low construction rules
3. LEFT / RIGHT structural requirements
4. Complete-cycle boundary
5. Application to historical raw data (source timestamps only)
6. Recording of every failure and exception
7. Validation

A target container must start strictly after the source container ends.
Source prices, candles or dates are never imported into the target. The target uses its own market data.

---

### 7. Failure & Exception Protocol

No forced matches.

Verdicts (locked):
- **MATCH** — Same container type, same H/L connection sequence (direct or mirrored), same completion signature, spacing/amplitude within tolerance.
- **PARTIAL-MATCH** — Type or sequence mostly matches but one window is missing, count is off by one, or completion is truncated.
- **NO-MATCH** — Connection sequence broken, type differs, or no completion.

A single structural-count or connection mismatch produces PARTIAL or NO-MATCH.
Best-candidate forcing is prohibited.

Where forward data is insufficient the record is marked UNRESOLVED and excluded from outcome statistics.
Missing fields are left blank; they are never filled.

---

### 8. AI Provenance / Footprint

Every research artifact carries:
- Document / file identity
- Source basis (named raw data files)
- Methodology version (currently 1.0-locked / 1.1-timezone-locked)
- Validation status
- Explicit statement of what was derived versus what remains undefined in the current specification

AI assistance is used only for extraction, organisation and formatting of already-locked rules.
No rule is invented by the model.

---

### 9. Validation Protocol

Creator and validator roles are separated.

- Creator locks the rules and produces the container database.
- Validator tests those locked rules against independent raw data without altering the rules.
- Any discrepancy is recorded as FAIL or INCOMPLETE; rules are not silently adjusted to improve results.

One SL hit stops further automatic logging until manual review.

---

### 10. Research Archive / Evidence

Current locked artifacts include:
- SRBMPR Container Transfer / Forward Trace specification (v1.0-locked + timezone extension)
- Board Transaction Log engine (strict no-fabrication rules)
- Daily Fallback Footprint sequences (HIGH↔LOW polarity + elapsed time + opportunity class)
- SRBMPR Time Sequence intervals (container-to-container spacing)
- Combined structural research file (H1 / M15 / M10 / M5 events with outcome labels)
- Cleaned Time Sequence CSV and parsed research tables

All timestamps are handled in UTC.
All statistics exclude UNRESOLVED and missing-field records.

---

### Professional Positioning Statement

I did not arrive here by following one trading system.
I studied multiple systems, recorded their failures against historical data, and progressively moved from trading concepts toward market-structure research.

The work product is the set of locked structural definitions, the raw-data protocol, the failure rules, and the archive of tested containers — not a claim of future performance.

---

**Note**
Where an exact numerical threshold (bar count, percentage tolerance, minimum duration, etc.) is not stated in the current locked specification, it is left as “Not defined in current specification.”
No values have been invented.

   Explore the documented case studies, structural decompositions, and machine-readable frameworks developed under SRBMPR. This research portfolio focuses on mapping historical market behavior and psychology through an auditable, empirical chain: from raw OHLC data and time containers to sequence transition, structural connection, and systematic validation. SRBMPR provides researchers and institutions with an objective framework for structural decomposition rather than speculative market predictions or trading signals.

Documented behavioral research and case studies

Review systematic structural mappings, high/low separations, and behavioral sequence transitions. Each study illustrates how raw historical price data is categorized into machine-readable behavioral containers for institutional validation and academic inquiry.

Examine the underlying research methodology

Learn how the SRBMPR framework transforms raw OHLC feeds into rigorous behavioral classifications, structured connections, and auditable historical datasets.

Create Your Own Website With Webador